The U.S. recession ended in 2010 and macroeconomic
indicators show a slow recovery. Real GDP growth figures (constant prices)
turned positive at 2.83 percent in 2010. Unemployment rates decreased to 8.2
percent in 2011 since their peak of 9.7 percent in 2010, and median nominal
incomes stabilized in 2011. Real incomes decreased during the crisis by several
percentage points. Interestingly, while total population growth
figures did not change much, the total number of households decreased as a
result of the crisis as family members chose to delay household formation or existing
households moved back in with parents or friends. The home-ownership rate
decreased to 65.4 percent at the end of 2010, down from an all-time high of 69.2
percent in the second quarter of 2004 (HUD). The U.S. housing and housing finance
markets have been in a state of flux since the housing bubble burst in 2006.
The housing market began to show signs of stabilization only in the last
quarter of 2011. Sales of existing homes
reached just over 4.5 million in early 2012, up from their lowest point of just
below 3.5 million in mid-2010 (new series MBA), but still well below their peak
of approximately 700,000 units in mid-2005. Sales of new one-family homes are still only a little more than
300,000 units per year (2/1/2012), a level not seen since early 1982, but this
trend appears to have bottomed out. Annual
house completions dropped from well over a million in 2008, to 794,400 in
2009 and 651,700 units in 2010 (HUD). Median
house prices have stabilized since 2010 in most markets after annual drops of
5 percent to 9 percent since the boom burst. And housing affordability is at an all-time high because of low house
prices and record low interest rates (30-year fixed rate mortgages hovered
around 4 percent Q1 2011). Yet many potential buyers face serious constraints
in acquiring a mortgage. Close to one fifth of 2007 borrowers are delinquent or
have defaulted and their impaired credit score will not allow them to get a
mortgage. At the same time, the banks and the government agencies Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac have tightened their allowable loan-to-value ratios (2010 data
show an average of 68 to 67 LTV ratios at origination) and increased the
required credit score to qualify for a mortgage. As a consequence, FHA-VA /Ginnie
Mae, the government guaranteed mortgage insurance and securitization system
that allows for higher LTV ratios and lower credit scores for qualifying
borrowers, has become the guarantor/securitizer of last resort with more than
half the total mortgages purchased by Government Sponsored Enterprises in 2011,
and is, therefore, exposed to a large proportion of the credit risk in the
mortgage sector. The size of the U.S. housing and
mortgage-market at the end of 2011 is estimated as follows: The total value of
the housing market is estimated at US$16.7 trillion; US$6.4 trillion in equity
and US$10.3 trillion in mortgage debt. Of the US$10.3 trillion in debt, US$5.5
trillion is in GSE mortgage-backed securities, US$1.1 trillion is private label
securities, US$2.9 trillion is in unsecuritized first lien mortgages in banks,
savings institutions, and Fannie and Freddie portfolios, and the remainder US$.9
trillion is in unsecuritized second liens. FNMA is the largest player in the
agency MBS market, with US$2.6 trillion, followed by Freddie Mac with US$1.6
trillion, and GNMA US$1.3 trillion. In 2011, the combined GSEs securitized more
than 90 percent of all mortgages originated, up from approximately 35 percent
in 2005 and 2006, and close to 10 percent was bank portfolio originations. The private
label MBS market was still only at 0.1 percent of new originations, down from
40 percent in 2006 (Federal Reserve Q4 2011, FNMA, FreddieMac, GinnieMae). The high level of properties with
negative equity, and foreclosed properties in the process of sale, and the many
mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure have prevented a normalization of
the market. It is likely that these conditions will remain a constraint through
2012 and 2013. Various government programs have stimulated different ways to
modify mortgages, but their success rate is low. A recent report[1] by FNMA’s and
Freddie Mac’s supervisor, Federal Housing Finance Agency, indicates that the
two agencies might be able to reduce the outstanding principle of qualifying
underwater mortgages. The
Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act of 2010 will have profound effects on the U.S.
housing and mortgage markets. First, mortgage lenders are prohibited from originating mortgages with predatory features.
Second, the act requires banks and regulators to facilitate changes that would increase the use of mortgage bonds.
Third, and heavily contested by the mortgage industry, the act requires a 5 percent risk retention by lenders on securitized
non-GSE mortgage loans that do not fulfill strict quality requirements. Qualified
Residential Mortgages (QRM) for which no risk retention is needed have
to comply to the following main requirements: a closed-end first lien mortgage
on a one-to-four-family property in which the borrower resides; no other lien
on the mortgage can exist at closing; a maximum maturity of 30 years; a maximum
LTV of 80 percent for purchase loans, where the LTV must reflect the appraised
value of the home if the price was higher than the appraised value; the down-payment
can include gifts but no loans; a maximum front-end debt-to-income (DTI) of 28
percent and a maximum back-end DTI of 36 percent. Fewer than one third of GSE loans
originated in 2009 would qualify as a QRM loan and far lower percentages for
previous years. The main outstanding policy decision
is on the future of FNMA and FreddieMac. The January 2011 Obama Administration
White Paper on the U.S. housing finance market only stated the need to wind
down the GSEs and provided three nested options for a housing finance market
without the GSEs.[2] [1] Federal Housing Finance Agency, "Addressing the Weak Housing Market: Is Principal Reduction the Answer?" [2] Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, "The U.S. Housing Market: Current Conditions and Policy Considerations,” Photo Source: City of New York, Department of Transportation
The Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center was permanently endowed by Samuel Zell in 1998. The Center was established in 1983 by The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania to foster excellence in real estate education and research.
Copyright © 2024. HOFINET. By using or accessing this website, you signify that you agree to the Terms of Use.
When using or citing any information displayed on this website or accompanying blog sites, you must provide a reference to HOFINET.